🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to protect females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a national appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for further review if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable discussions in additional member states